
Jesus, your not talking about some saint here. First you start your insane argument by distancing her form her Husbands time in office, check it out that's the 30 years of experience she so blatantly claimed as her own. It is obvious you are a women's rights activist trying to rewrite Senator Clintons resume to give you something to @!$%# about. The woman is a great democrat who lost the nomination on her own. If she choices she can still make a big change while achieving her goals. Her and Obama share the same ideas. The most effective use of her time would be as Senate Majority Leader. Between her and him they could control government and give it back to us the people. I for one (Vietnam 68-70) am tired of seeing our children sent to some insane war with no objective that is good for the USA. In addition we are being forced to pay(thru our taxes) the cost of killing our own kids, it is disgusting as is George dummy Bush. Now lets change all this Clinton (who I admire for toughness) should be urged by her followers to be Majority Whip (keeping Obama on course) With Obama in office all their good ideas could actually see fruitation. Please everyone come together, do my math, its a workable equation. God Bless America Joe
I don't know the way the media treated our good Senator is going to affect a great many voters come November.This one included. I do agree with the article she is a very special, tough lady, and one hard act to follow in the fall if she is not nominated.
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |